(2) is right on the ball, I think: at the moment, his views are Politically Correct enough to offset the parts about having people killed.
As for (1), there's established legal precedent that the First Amendment does not confer a freedom to actively incite the murder of specific individuals. From anyone else, posting photographs of individual police officers and advising people to go kill them would be a ticket to Federal stir, if not Gitmo.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
As for (1), there's established legal precedent that the First Amendment does not confer a freedom to actively incite the murder of specific individuals. From anyone else, posting photographs of individual police officers and advising people to go kill them would be a ticket to Federal stir, if not Gitmo.