Two reasons: 1) He's exercising his rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and 2) Whether the Powers That Be dare to act on his suggestion or not, they agree with him.
(2) is right on the ball, I think: at the moment, his views are Politically Correct enough to offset the parts about having people killed.
As for (1), there's established legal precedent that the First Amendment does not confer a freedom to actively incite the murder of specific individuals. From anyone else, posting photographs of individual police officers and advising people to go kill them would be a ticket to Federal stir, if not Gitmo.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
1) He's exercising his rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
2) Whether the Powers That Be dare to act on his suggestion or not, they agree with him.
no subject
As for (1), there's established legal precedent that the First Amendment does not confer a freedom to actively incite the murder of specific individuals. From anyone else, posting photographs of individual police officers and advising people to go kill them would be a ticket to Federal stir, if not Gitmo.