So, $11.61 of our long distance bill is now officially "in dispute." The first disputed call, one billed minute to Coral Springs, Florida, is apparently to a Jay Barber. (We don't know anyone named Jay Barber.) The third, ten billed minutes to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, is to a Lori Sedaka. (We don't know anyone named Lori Sedaka.)
The really fun one is the second call, six billed minutes to Auburn, California, at a fraction over $1.80 per minute, which Sprint tells us is a collect call to us that we accepted, but couldn't say who it was from. BZZZZZZZZZZZZZT! Thank you for playing, next contestant please! We have neither accepted nor, in fact, received any collect calls from ANYONE, let alone from California towns in which we don't know anyone.
However, there can't possibly be a billing error, because as the Sprint customer service drone assured me,
"...with the new digital switches in our central offices, it's impossible for a call to be incorrectly billed."
And what value of "impossible" do they use on his planet, I wonder? I dunno about anyone else, but any time someone tells me "[FITB] error is impossible", my bogometer starts beeping and blinking red warning lights.
no subject
no subject
I've generally had good luck with MCI as a long distance carrier. Sprint has always had Customer No-Service... and as a rule I don't do business with DeathStarCo.
I can't really recommend any of the "alternate" CLEC's... but you can at least cut your local service down to a bare minimum, and make sure your LD is by Somebody Else.
Can't have a billing error. Feh. Somewhere a human hit the keys. By definition it has bugs.
no subject
FITB= fill in the blank
no subject
no subject
Unfortunately, Earthlink is the only dialup ISP we've found yet whose unlimited dialup really is unlimited.
no subject
You sure you're going to be limited to 16.4? Even behind a nasty-ass filter, we were getting 21.6 in Norcross.... I get 41.6 even on lousy lines here (Lisakit's trailer)...
no subject
As to 16.4, "will be limited to", probably not, anywhere but here. "Are limited to", definitely looks that way until Hell freezes over or Sprint replaces the goddamn lines.... And once we get out of here, of course, dialup speed limitations should cease to be an issue.
no subject
Heh. I parsed it as "Fucked in the brain".
-Ogre
no subject
"Sorry buddy, I work in software for a living. I know exactly how fucked up computers can get. You're going to have to pick another excuse. Try the one about it being a problem with the positronic routers, I'd be much more inclined to believe that."
"Tell your dev team to stop beta testing its buggy hardware on the paying customers."
-Ogre
no subject