... I still say that both of our Presidential candidates suck. (And that's in the "wet farts out of dead pigeons" way, not the good way.)
But I gotta admit, after today's perhaps-surprising news, I think our Vice-Presidential choices — or the Republican one, at least — just got a whole lot better. Sarah Palin appears to be sane, honest, and fiscally responsible, and she's not afraid to out corrupt members of her own party. She cleaned house in the Alaska state legislature. Further, it looks as though she stands by her principles, but is willing to calmly accept being overruled or proven wrong, and she's not afraid to publicly change her mind.¹ Her approval ratings in Alaska are frequently in the 90s. When she ran for Mayor of Wasilla in 1996, she made a campaign promise to cut her own salary — and kept it. Then when she ran for Governor of Alaska in 2006, she made a campaign promise to sell the IAI Westwind II executive jet purchased (on state government credit) by the Murkowski administration ... and kept that promise, too.
I mean, DAMN! Can't we, you know, swap the ticket around and make McCain VP? C'mon, folks, our first female President doesn't HAVE to be a Democrat.
[1] "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day." — Self-Reliance, Ralph Waldo Emerson, 1841
no subject
And she's pro-life, like many other people, but unlike Dubya, does not believe that contraception is De Debbil.
Then, she's personally opposed to gay marriage; but she vetoed a bill that would have barred the State from granting same-sex benefits to gay couples, after consulting with the State AG and being advised that it was probably unconstitutional. Now, you can take that as "she only vetoed it because the AG said she had to", but it could just as well be "Wait a minute here, can we even DO this?"
Seems to me she has a clear religious viewpoint, but refuses to allow her religious views to get in the way of doing her job as objectively and fairly as she can. And really, what more can you ask than that?
In which, as she has in the State legislature, she showed herself honest and fiscally responsible. She's now the governor of a state which, to many practical purposes, may almost as well be an independent nation, surrounded as it is by foreign nations, and doing a damned good job of it by all accounts. Meanwhile, Barack Obama has three terms in the Illinois Senate (two of them partial) and one in the US Senate, in none of which he managed to distinguish himself enough to really appear on the radar screen until he decided to run for President.
So what's your point exactly...?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject