Derek Lowe on the health care bill

[unixronin]

Derek Lowe (of In the Pipeline, and of Things i Won't Work With fame) discusses his thoughts on the health care bill.

Here goes: first off, it's rather hard for me to get past my anger at being told (repeatedly, by both the President and members of Congress) that this bill will "bend the cost curve" and on top of that, actually reduce the deficit.  This is, in this case, such a transparent lie that it indicates actual contempt for their audience on the part of those repeating it.  We can start with history and general principles: I have yet to hear of a state or federal health care system in this country that has not ended up costing hugely more than it was ever slated to.

I can get more specific in this case, though, since the entire bill was carefully structured to show a spurious deficit reduction (in order for it to be pushed through the budget reconciliation process, without which it could not have passed at all).  Costs are pushed out past the Congressional Budget Office's ten-year time horizon, offloaded onto the states (whose Attorneys-General are now frantically trying to figure out what to do), or just blatantly left out.  In the last category is the "doc fix", the adjustment to Medicare reimbursement rates that had to be dropped from the current bill in order to hocus the CBO numbers.  The firm understanding between the interested parties is that the House will quietly pass that in the near future when not so many people are paying attention, and damn the numbers anyway.  As I said above, "contempt" is the word that keeps coming to mind.

I share his reservations.  Particularly at this time in history, with the US economy already punch-drunk and reeling and with the second body-blow of commercial property defaults about to start hitting any time now, I have serious concerns that the real costs of this bill, and the overall staggering rate at which this administration is spending money it doesn't have (it has actually accomplished the near-impossible of making the just-passed Bush administration look frugal by comparison) may bankrupt the United States.  The US national debt is now something over $40,000 for every man, woman and child in the US, and is increasing at about $11 per person per day.  By the end of this year it will be approaching $44,000 per person.

This entry was originally posted at http://alaric.dreamwidth.org/12072.html. That post currently has comments.
You may comment there via OpenID even if you do not have a Dreamwidth account.

Comments

[randwolf.livejournal.com]

It's not likely to make the government or personal debt picture better, I think, but it's also not likely to make it worse. Real problem is we've still got to address the outrageously high amount of government money spent on health care in the US--fully twice that of countries with single-payer or regulated national insurance plans. Somehow the gummint has to face up to the malfeasance on the part of the financial services industry, of which insurance, of course, is a part and, so far, no-one wants to bell that particular big cat. As usual, the worst problem is in the Senate.

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

Oh, it gets better. For some values of 'better'. Here's an analysis in the NYT of just how far from reality the numbers the Democrat Party fed the CBO are. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21holtz-eakin.html?ref=opinion)