I find this bothers me. What makes the government so special that they should get this information but I shouldn't be able to access it?
Make the information available, or not. But making it available just to the government and "critical infractructure providers" Because They're Somehow Special is silly. My infrastructure is crucial to me. How come I don't rate access to the information? Who gets to decide whose infrastructure is "crucial"?
Tags:
no subject
As far as I know, they're not getting the patches early, just advance technical information. Really, the question I'm asking here is, if they're making that advance technical information available to the government and to whoever Microsoft thinks is a "crucial" service provider who needs it, does it really cost any more to just give everyone access to it?
no subject
The easier it is for N. E. Miscellaneous-Sysadmin to get the advance info on the patch, the easier it is for I. M. A. Malicious-Bastard to get it and use it to circumvent it, especially in the case of patches that correct security exploits, which seem to be the vast majority of patches that MS releases - even for Windows Seven.
Given that Certain Not Openly Hostile Governments But We Know Better, Don't We have been implicated in cyberattacks on Governments Not Considered Hostile But Maybe We Still Know Better, well... I can't really say that it's the wrong thing to do.
no subject
no subject