Wouldn't it be better to research potential investments more thoroughly and only invest in the ones that seem sound?
Of course, when you can't trust the bond ratings, how do you know?
Well, then perhaps it might be better to just stay away from financial derivatives altogether?
no subject
no subject
Perhaps make decisions for various types of clients - "OK, you want high-risk high-return, we're going to put your money into specific biotech companies and venture capital funds that we have evaluated as having better risk/return ratios than other investments of that type."
I have some idea of what the MBA core curriculum involves. Most of the quantitative stuff, certainly at schools like Sloan and Harvard, consists of the math and methods required to make just that kind of evaluation.
That's what these people are supposed to be *paid* for. To be a sort of financial-evaluation gyroscope, diverting investment in general towards efficient, productive uses and away from inefficient wastes.
...sometimes, like I said, I can be very idealistic.
no subject
http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2010/04/methinks-felix-salmon-confuses-goldman-sachs-with-jp-morgan-ca-1900.html
no subject
What I have a problem with is the invention of ever more complex, ever more abstract derivatives to construct house-of-cards financial structures whose whole purpose is to create imaginary money that exists only on paper, backed with imaginary money that exists only on paper, backed with imaginary money that exists only on paper, backed with imaginary money that exists only on paper, backed with ....
It's a recipe for disaster. As we've just seen. Especially when you add into this the idea that all financial risk can be defined and repackaged away and made Somebody Else's Problem. And ESPECIALLY when you add in the idea that the companies doing this are "too important to fail", and therefore can afford to lose their financial gambles because they know that WHEN, not if, it all goes pear-shaped, they'll be bailed out with other people's money.
no subject
no subject
"... you can always bet against them ..."
By this I believe you are referring to short-selling, yes?
What if we just banned margin accounts entirely? Or allowed margins accounts for betting on the upside, but banned short-selling?
no subject