Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 12:14 pm

I believe I've previously commented on issues with the Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000.  You can go look for the prior post if you want to; I'm not going to.  Instead, I'll briefly summarize the issues:

  • The MS Natural 4000 is frequently not recognized at boot time as a keyboard, even by motherboards that are aware of USB keyboards.  This causes "no keyboard connected" warnings, and can cause problems getting into the BIOS setup if you have to.
  • The keyboard will sometimes spontaneously begin auto-repeating a key you didn't even press.  (n and t are common.)  It can be quite difficult to get it to stop.  Needless to say, the wrong key autorepeating at the wrong moment could be catastrophic.
  • There's the whole silly F-lock business.  By itself, this would just be silly wasted functionality, but when the keyboard forgets its F-lock state, it defaults to the alternate key meanings.
  • And then there's the key cap life issue.  A Natural 4000's key cap legends — which appear to be just printed decals, and exceptionally thin ones at that — begin to wear away within a few months of normal use, and by six months many of them will be completely blank.

My first Natural Keyboard 4000 was replaced under warranty by Microsoft at five months' age.  (It carries a three year warranty.)  Within four months of replacement, the replacement had the same problem.  I'm guessing Microsoft replaced a LOT of Natural Keyboard 4000s with worn-blank key caps, and decided it was costing them too much money.

You see, they've now solved the problem with a brilliantly simple strategy.  What's more, this solution automatically extends to all existing keyboards already sold!  Astounding!

The solution?

They have simply defined the Natural Keyboard 4000's absurdly short key cap life to be "normal wear".  Thus it is no longer covered under the warranty.

I suppose this is to be expected from Microsoft.  It's not like they don't already have a history of making their shoddy products become their customer's problem.  But this is more blatant than usual; they have basically just declared an endemic problem with one of their products to be not a problem, in order to avoid having to honor their warranty on the product.

Maybe, just maybe, Microsoft, before warranting this keyboard for three years, you should have done some actual wear testing on it to see whether or not it would actually stand up to three years of use.  Or one.  Or even six months.  But now that you've put it out on the market with a three-year warranty, the least you could do is suck it up and honor your warranty.  Or, god forbid, have your hardware OEM actually fix the problem.

But it's easier to just let your name become still more tarnished, isn't it?

Tags:
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 04:40 pm (UTC)
I'm definitely disgusted. I'm also disappointed, since I like ergonomic keyboards, and I was planning to get one in the near future.

Microsoft keeps living down to its reputation.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 05:28 pm (UTC)
Unfortunately, there seems to be a great dearth of other ergonomic keyboards on the market. Adesso makes this one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823166080) and this one (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823166033) (and color variations etc on both), but the former comes with a built-in track-pad that is widely reported as being problematic, the latter has one of those keyboard layouts that is distorted by a freakishly gigantic Enter key, and both apparently send strange key scan codes that cause problems on any OS except Windows. What's more, they're apparently only capable of sensing one key press at a time, making them utterly useless to gamers or anyone else who needs to be able to use key chords. Logitech, to my knowledge, has only ever produced one decent ergonomic keyboard, and it was a wireless keyboard that was available only in a bundle with a bizarrely asymmetric wireless mouse that didn't appear to be designed to fit any human hand not crippled by arthritis.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 06:09 pm (UTC)
Thank you!

I remember the Logitech one. That mouse was ridiculous.

Since I'm not a gamer and I'm using Windows, the Adesso one might work for me. However, I remember one other keyboard -- or maybe it was that one -- with the outsized Enter key. The contortions necessary to avoid it nearly negated any ergonomic benefits of the rest of the keyboard.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 06:31 pm (UTC)
The really weird thing about the Adessos is that the versions with the integrated trackpad have a normal Enter key. You have to wonder what they were thinking.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 05:54 pm (UTC)
At work, I have a Microsoft Natural Keyboard Elite, complete with a gel wristpad that is curved to match the keyboard's funky shape. It's been rock-solid for years, and the key caps are only just now starting to wear off.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 06:28 pm (UTC)
Exactly. I have three or four other MS keyboards still around (one Natural Elite and two or three Natural Pros), and none of them — or any of the Sun, Apple, Keytronic, or Dell keyboards — has a key cap wear problem. Some of these keyboards are fifteen years old.

I have two Natural 4000s, and both of them wore mostly blank in a matter of months.

This is clearly an aberration that's far beyond any reasonable standard of normal wear, but Microsoft has decided it's cheaper to piss their customers off than to cop to it and fix the problem.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 08:27 pm (UTC)
Well, that's one less expensive kludge I need to buy. I do remember Logitech's mouse -- it cost maybe 20 times what it was worth, and did about 1/20th the work an optical mouse does with a million times the fuss. Sounds like this Microsoft keyboard is just a reworked, upscale version of the Logitech mouse.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 10:33 pm (UTC)
This is one of several reasons I do not voluntarily use anything by Microsoft.

I'm forced to have Windows; inertia, and the lack of anything that resembles real competition, pretty much require me to use MS Office. I will not use IE or Hotmail, and from my perspective the existence of Bing seems like pure hubris - "they really think people are going to *volunteer* to use one of their products, on an open market?"

Microsoft's attitude has for a very damn long time, IMO, been "you're stuck with us, that's your problem, sucks to be you" - open, active contempt for their customers.
Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 10:47 pm (UTC)
Yup. As far aback as I remember, Microsoft's development attitude was "Eh, push it out, the customers will find the bugs for us." It's only in the last few years that Microsoft has become at all proactive about finding and fixing bugs — and even then, several major security features got dropped from Vista because there wasn't time before the promised ship date to complete both the core security features and this, that or the other trivial piece of shiny desktop bling.