Germany is preparing to start making life hard for spammers ... and that's as in hard time. A new draft law features heavy fines for both spammers and companies that use their services, with prison terms for the worst offenders.
Meanwhile in Iraq, thousands of Marines are being told it's their patriotic duty to pray for George Bush, complete with mail-in coupons to certify that they've been doing so. (At least they're not being told to pray TO him yet.)
Ireland plans a referendum to change Irish citizenship law, which currently grants automatic citizenship to any baby born in the country regardless of the nationality of the parents -- the only EU nation to do so. Hmmmm, as far as I know, the US does that too.....
Dateline Miami, Florida, where the Crown Prince of Spain and his fiancee passed through Thursday evening with their official bodyguards, to make a flight connection enroute from the Bahamas to Madrid ... and where the Transportation Safety Authority decided it was necessary to screen and search them both. It has apparently not been decided yet whether Spain will file an official diplomatic complaint. Gee, look, foreign relations at work!
And last but not least, speaking of your tax dollars at work, the Bush white house has released a memo showing that it was clearly known Osama bin Laden was planning and conducting terrorist actions in the US. The BBC's Jon Leyne says it may be no coincidence that the White House has chosen to release this document at a time in the weekend when most Americans are not following the news very closely. Meanwhile, the FBI has accused National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice of perjury regarding her testimony before the 9/11 commission. The FBI assertion is that Rice is cooking the numbers to make it appear that far more resources were being devoted to al-Qaeda than there actually were; Among other disputed statements, Rice apparently bundled investigations of other organizations, and even simple criminal investigations, into her claimed "70 separate investigations of al-Qaeda cells" before 9/11.
Update:
Fixed a missing link in the last story.
no subject
Well, when I first read your blurb, I thought that was completely reprehensible. Upon reading the link, however, I find that they are not being told that by their officers, but rather by a church group distributing pamphlets. Somehow, it matters who is doing the telling, don't you think?
no subject
These guys are in the line of fire, in harm's way; Bush is sitting safe and pretty in Washington DC; and they're being told to pray for HIM? Excuse me? Do we have a little problem with priorities and maybe reality here?
(Apart from anything else, sorry and all that, but anyone who's delusional enough to think that they can persuade their god to take a direct hand in influencing the next election on their behalf is not someone I want having any influence in the government that has the power to really fuck up my life even worse than it already is, thank you very much. The world already has a more than sufficient quota of nations ruled by religious zealots.)
no subject
Well... it's a known quality of human nature that if a religious group should find itself able to legislate its own beliefs, it will do so. The Framers knew this, and took steps to prevent it. We should expect this behavior from a church -- but find it unconscionable in a government. So far, I'm not squicked by this sequence of events.
In the heavy-on-the-irony department, this church will lose its 501(c) standing if the current Administration has its way with changing IRS regulations to gag religious groups.
no subject
That would be humorous. However, I roll to disbelieve that this administration would not find -- or create -- a loophole to prevent any God-fearin' Christian Church And Moral Foundation Of Our Community, especially one that exhorts troops under fire in the field to pray for Bush, from losing its 501(c) status.
no subject
Personally, the w versus v, g versus k, s versus zz are much more comical. At least they retain some of the characteristics of the language, unlike the scattershot umlauting.
no subject
(hmmm..... actually, thinking about pronunciation instead of relying on memory .... yes, that would be incorrect, wouldn't it? Oops.)
no subject
Mistakes happen. This time it did not change the sense of the word, only created a non-word. Whereas if you umlaut the subject of your earlier posting, getting Schützstaffeln, you'd be talking not about homeland security but a shooting squad.
no subject
There's a practical difference?
no subject
no subject
Don't Marines in the field already pray for "bush"?
But, in the end, I think it is just plain tacky. "Hiyee! We know you're out here getting shot at and stuff; but, could you please pray for the President back in the States surrounded by bodyguards? Thanks!"
What's the source for the "FBI has accused National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice of perjury" statement. I didn't see that in the referenced article and a quick news search didn't turn up much. For anyone speaking for the FBI to be making these sorts of accusations at the National Security Advisor pretty much would indicate that the Administration had chosen Rice to be the 'fall guy'. And I am just not seeing that....
Re: Don't Marines in the field already pray for "bush"?
Heh. Point. :)
Yeah, tacky is the least of it. I think partly, I no longer believe that Bush isn't loony enough (and convinced enough of his holy mandate) to make it a Presidential order. But, hello Washington? THESE are the guys who need praying for, if that's your thing.
As for Rice, the article didn't specifically use the word perjury, no, and I don't know if the FBI specifically used the word perjury. They said she lied under oath in her testimony before the Congressional committee, which last time I looked was the definition of perjury -- lying under oath. They charged Ollie North with perjury when he did it, and this is a more senior official in the government, lying to cover the President's ass in what is arguably at least as serious a matter.
Re: Don't Marines in the field already pray for "bush"?
Indeed. But, I just went back and re-read the article and I am still missing where the FBI says that Condoleeza Rice lied during her testimony to the 9/11 Committee. So, I was just wondering if this comes from another article, or if I am just completely on crack and missing it in this one, and who the "they" is who is saying it.
Re: Don't Marines in the field already pray for "bush"?
Now if I can find it again .........
Aha! Found it (http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-rice0410,0,3695500.story?coll=ny-nation-big-pix), and fixed it in the original post too.
Re: Don't Marines in the field already pray for "bush"?