Thursday, March 26th, 2009 01:00 pm

MSNBC reports on pre-teen prostitution in Pakistan.  Some of the article is unintentionally ironic:

Others in the country have targeted the police’s inability to protect children as a reason to rally the people against the government.

“This is exactly why all the religious parties are campaigning for Shariah law,” said Maulvi Noor Mohammed, a hard-line Islamic cleric, known for his ties to the Taliban.

[...]

“What these men are doing is against Islam and they must be punished accordingly,” he said.  “Islam guarantees protection for these young girls.”

...Just so long as they don’t, say, show their hair or ankles outside the house, or, kiss someone in public, or, Allah forbid, kiss someone before marriage.  In which case we’ll stone them to death in the name of Allah.  For their own good!

Thursday, March 26th, 2009 05:30 pm (UTC)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7959100.stm
Thursday, March 26th, 2009 05:41 pm (UTC)
heh.

ihnjh,ijls "Law of unintended consequences" :)
Thursday, March 26th, 2009 05:42 pm (UTC)
Part of the irony stems from the fact that it *is* against Islam. So is a bunch of the stuff the Taliban enforces . . .

As with Christian and Jewish (and Hindu, and . . .) fundies, take what you want from scripture and ignore the parts you don't.
Thursday, March 26th, 2009 05:46 pm (UTC)
hypocritical zealots (of any flavor), you don't say!

#
Thursday, March 26th, 2009 07:51 pm (UTC)
If you look at it, Shariah law is pretty reasonable. It has it's roots in the same western values that we are used to.

Problem, it is significantly subject to judicial interpretation. Problem, what some governments in the region call Shariah law, is not.
Thursday, March 26th, 2009 09:18 pm (UTC)
Child prostitution == Bad.

Child marriage == Just fucking dandy.