Calling all geeks

[unixronin]

We have a 500-gallon outside propane tank. It's maybe 30 feet from the house.  It has a gauge on top, under an armored cover, but the tank is frequently on the far side of (and frequently covered in) significant amounts of snow.

Does anyone happen to know of, or have any suggestions for, a way I can remotely monitor the level of propane in the tank?  Obviously anything that would involve retrofitting a sensor of some kind inside the tank is pretty much out.

Edited to add:  I need to get data back in a form that can just be logged and charted automatically 24 hours a day, preferably without having to do image recognition on webcam images of the gauge.

Comments

Re: Tank level

[ithildae.livejournal.com]

The snow on the tank with throw the weight off. The snow will also distort the sonics of a percussive form of measurement. The pressure will be dependent on Temperature. I am stumped for a reasonable way of looking inside a metal container. Some sort of flow measure would be the best I can think of, off the top of my head.

[Thought] Is it possible to introduce a radio signal? There may be a frequency that propane liquid is opaque to. The chamber should have a resonant frequency based on the gas chamber volume.

Re: Tank level

[cipherpunk.livejournal.com]

Density of propane: 508 kg/m^3
Density of snow: 50-150kg/m^3

The relative densities are such that it will take a lot of snow to throw off the calculations by an appreciable amount.

You can also take the weight of the snow into account. Look at how much the tank weighed before the blizzard, then look at how much it weighed after the blizzard. The difference will be a fairly good approximation of the weight of the snow on the tank, which can then be factored into ongoing calculations.

Piezo is simple, effective, and accurate enough. It's still the one to beat, IMO.

Re: Tank level

[ithildae.livejournal.com]

I will take your word for piezo accuracy. I would have thought that a 10 - 30% density decrease for snow would still make a noticeable difference to the weight. (But I considered an error > 5% from theoretical to be a personal insult in my college labs.)

Would it be possible to measure under just one anchor point?

Re: Tank level

[cipherpunk.livejournal.com]

Well, like I said, you can account for most of the accumulated snow weight just by measuring tank weight before and after the blizzard. Admittedly, some propane will get used during the blizzard, but as far as first-order estimates go it's not a bad one.

I sympathize with you on your within-5% instincts. It's an excellent ideal to live up to. In this case, though, we can live with 50% experimental error. If unixronin measures the tank as being 10% full, then it's time to refill the tank regardless of whether it's 5% full or 15% full. Quick and dirty is good enough for our purposes.

I think it's possible to measure under one anchor point, yes, esp. if it's done under the geometric center of mass.

Re: Tank level

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

There's actually two primary goals here:

(1) Get an actual metric for the rate we're using propane in various combinations of use
(2) When the delivery slip says 300 gallons, be able to verify that the driver really did put 300 gallons in.

Apparently a previous delivery driver in this area was caught over-billing customers and putting the excess propane into his own tank. He got free propane, while the customers on his route paid for propane they weren't getting.

Re: Tank level

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

Snow on the tank will throw the weight off, yes, but not by much. The maximum snow load on the tank might be the equivalent of a gallon or two of propane.