Since the end of August, Gortney said, there have been 50 instances where coalition ships have disrupted potential pirate attacks, throwing guns overboard and sinking small skiffs. But in many instances they had to release the people on the ships because of the legal hurdles.
I put it to you that there is a simple solution to this:
"If we find you loitering with apparent intent in the shipping lanes, in a small boat with weapons, we will presumptively assume that you are a pirate. Game over."
no subject
So, it would seem to me, that unless all of the fishing industry in that area has dried up (which _could_ be the case), then your heuristic is awfully prone to false positives.
no subject
no subject
"If we find you loitering with apparent intent in the shipping lanes, in a small boat with weapons, we will presumptively assume that you are a pirate. Game over."
that's a solution with bad false positives.
no subject
I also tend to doubt the idea that ordinary honest fishermen who'd never think of piracy are going to be putting to sea heavily armed. The evidence seems to indicate the pirates aren't going after the fishermen. A net half-full of bream doesn't bring in much money when your business plan is based on ransoming supertankers.