Nightline on Obama, gun control

[unixronin]

Nightline broadcast a good and pretty balanced segment last night, discussing Barak Obama's gun control position and the massive gun buying rush that's going on across the US now by people concerned that if they don't buy them now, they won't be able to.

Particular points to note:

• The customer who keeps repeating to the reporter, "Never mind Obama's words, look at his actions."¹
• The gunshop owner reporting Obama supporters coming into his store wearing their Obama buttons, who just voted for him but are still afraid he'll ban guns.

[1]  You might have seen me say this once or twice.  Assuming you've been paying attention.

Comments

[ossuarian.livejournal.com]

The whole idea of 'winning' in Iraq is dishonest. We don't have an enemy in the traditional sense. We are a sometimes referee, sometimes participant in a vast turf war among many, many factions. I'd really have like to see someone ask McCain "What exactly do you mean by winning in Iraq?" The answer would be:

1. Something that is either basically dishonest or betrays a willful misunderstanding of what is happening in Iraq.

2. "It's over when General Petreus says it is." Now, the thought of the military setting military objectives should scare the crap out of any thinking person. (Footnote: The military should have a say in what it needs to achieve objectives and whether it exists, and for most of this war, it didn't have that, either).

The Iraq war is such an amoral exercise. I'm deeply ashamed of it, and I'll sleep better when it's behind us.

Anyhow, if Obama has a history of tough gun control as a state and U.S. senator, he might not as president. He represented one of the most anti-gun districts in the country. Now he represents a pro-gun country. It's like LBJ who fought segregation until he was president and he then defended it.

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

I'd really have like to see someone ask McCain "What exactly do you mean by winning in Iraq?"

That would, indeed, be a very pertinent question. Personally, my best shot at a definition would be "When Iraq has a stable, self-sustaining government that governs with the consent of the Iraqi people, an independently functioning economy, and no insurgent threat strong enough to pose a significant threat to the Iraqi people or government."

Anyhow, if Obama has a history of tough gun control as a state and U.S. senator, he might not as president. He represented one of the most anti-gun districts in the country. Now he represents a pro-gun country. It's like LBJ who fought segregation until he was president and he then defended it.

You have a point, and I'd very much like to see that outcome. I'm afraid that so far, the early signs seem to indicate he intends to go on as he always has. I'm willing to have him prove me wrong — hell, I'd LOVE to be proven wrong on this one — but I'm not willing to just accept his or anyone else's word for it until I see it reflected in his actions.

[ossuarian.livejournal.com]

Well, if Obama was promising not to push gun control laws, I'd expect him to keep that promise no matter his record. I haven't heard of any such promise, but it's not an issue I follow with much attention.

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

Exactly. He hasn't made any such promise. He tells shooters he supports the Second Amendment, then turns around and tells his supporters he's in favor of more gun control.

[fruitylips.livejournal.com]

Obama doesn't have to push it. Does anyone really think that if Congress drops a new gun control bill on his desk that he's going to say 'Now, now, guys...I didn't push for this, so I'm going to veto it. You have to wait until I ask for it.' Obviously, he will sign it.

The President can try it influence (and often does), but does not set Congressional priorities.