Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, November 8th, 2008 02:00 pm

Nightline broadcast a good and pretty balanced segment last night, discussing Barak Obama's gun control position and the massive gun buying rush that's going on across the US now by people concerned that if they don't buy them now, they won't be able to.

Particular points to note:

  • The customer who keeps repeating to the reporter, "Never mind Obama's words, look at his actions.
  • The gunshop owner reporting Obama supporters coming into his store wearing their Obama buttons, who just voted for him but are still afraid he'll ban guns.

[1]  You might have seen me say this once or twice.  Assuming you've been paying attention.

Tags:
Saturday, November 8th, 2008 09:53 pm (UTC)
(Sorry, original reply was mis-posted.)

That's an interesting point. It opens the whole can of worms about who gets to define "self defense". Do you use the government's definition or define it according to your own perspective?

I can see how a semi-automatic would be more suitable (and convenient) for self defense purposes.
Saturday, November 8th, 2008 11:12 pm (UTC)
The law generally defines "self-defense" as whether a "reasonable person" would believe they were in danger of life or limb, or was defending the life or limb of a third party. Texas is the only state that allows lethal force in defense of property that I'm aware of (although a number of states have a "castle doctrine" under which intruders in your home are presumed to have the intent and capability of doing you harm).
Sunday, November 9th, 2008 12:58 am (UTC)
Does not Georgia consider arson to be a "heinous crime" justifying you in using deadly force? It did the last time I checked....