Everyone knows that microwave-cooked food isn't as nourishing, right? Because microwaves destroy vitamins? I've heard that one lots of times, and I'm sure you have too.
Turns out that not only is it not so, but the shoe's on the other foot. You see, microwaves don't destroy vitamins. What destroys vitamins is heat, and duration of heat. Microwave ovens cook food more quickly than traditional cooking methods, and so they actually destroy less of the vitamins.
If you want to destroy the nutritional value of your vegetables, don't microwave them — boil them to mush. You know, the traditional vegetable-cooking technique.
Tags:
YAY!
Re: YAY!
Bzzzzt! Wrong.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Certainly seemed traditional as far as the kitchens at school were concerned anyway. If you could recognise the individual brussels sprouts or potatos then they clearly hadn't been boiled for long enough...
no subject
Steaming is possible in the microwave or on the stove top.
Tastier, retains or enhances nutritional value.
(Also -- wow?! That misconception is still around? WTF. I thought we'd gotten over the "microwaves are a new, fearsome technology that has bizarre, satanistic effects" meme some years ago,)
no subject
My MiL boils canned vegetables to "make sure they are cooked". Which is why I think My Husband dis-likes so many vegetables.
Myth Busted!
no subject
no subject
no subject
"Grey boiled meat was good enough for great-granddad, and it's bloody well good enough for us!"
no subject
no subject
Neither makes any difference in how I use the microwave. I can't stand the taste of meat, especially chicken, cooked in it.
no subject
no subject