Monday, September 1st, 2008 12:35 pm

The mind-boggling stupidity documented in this, and the near-illiteracy of the messages left by the daughter's friends in this, make me weep for the future of our civilisation.

What the hell is wrong with us?

Monday, September 1st, 2008 04:44 pm (UTC)
And lo, SMS was invented, and brought the language back to the level of spelling prevalent in the 17th century.

*ahem*

"lol"
Monday, September 1st, 2008 05:31 pm (UTC)
I think 17th is overly generous. :)
Monday, September 1st, 2008 05:06 pm (UTC)
there are posters in the mall, written in sms-text, that basically say "if you can read this, this applies to you... no loitering, no groups of 3 or more, don't wear black, no weird makeup, don't harrass the cash holders..." stuff like that. paraphrased. cuz i don't actually speak sms :)

k thx bye

#
Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:15 pm (UTC)
Christiana Mall, off I95 in Delaware, has now taken to checking IDs. No one under 18 permitted in the mall on Friday and Saturday nights unless accompanied by an adult. As a former teenaged "maul rat", I'm kind of annoyed at this policy. :-(
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008 01:57 am (UTC)
What if you need to buy something?
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008 02:58 am (UTC)
Well, nobody under 18 has any money, obviously. :-P
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008 10:26 am (UTC)
Personally, I'm kinda horrified by the idea of any place so blighted that the only thing to do on Friday and Saturday nights is go hang out at the mall.
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008 08:42 pm (UTC)
I have a whole rant about that, but this isn't the space for it....
Monday, September 1st, 2008 07:25 pm (UTC)
Before SMS we had d00d speak, my mocking term for l33t speak. Before that there was redacted netmail and ascii p0rn and before that redacted teletype messages and baudot encoded porn.


Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:05 pm (UTC)
D00D!!! MI N@M3 IZ B1FF!!!!111one!!!!
Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:10 pm (UTC)
I always thought one of the funniest parts of d00dspeak was how much effort some of'em were obviously putting into it. Some if it was fairly inventive, true, but anything that takes two or three times as long as just using plain English is sort of inherently self-parodying.
Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:12 pm (UTC)
In defense of SMS-speak, one of the issues they're working around is a 160-character limit. Also, texting using a telephone keypad is a pain. Heck, it's even a pain with the QWERTY keyboards on smartphones. I think I'd play loose with orthography in that situation too.
Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:21 pm (UTC)
Also, texting using a telephone keypad is a pain.
Well, yeah, stipulated. So why do they spend so bloody much time DOING it then? :)
Image (http://www.theaterhopper.com/?date=20080825)
Monday, September 1st, 2008 10:10 pm (UTC)
I think it's because you can do it reasonably discreetly without disturbing others or tipping nearby adults as to what's going on. Nearby adults, in particular, don't end up hearing half of the phone conversation, so it's also more private. It's also less synchronous than a phone conversation, so it demands less of either party's attention, and if you text someone, they don't have to answer you immediately.

And I say this as someone who grew up in a house where there was one landline telephone, and it hung on the wall in the kitchen, so whichever parent(s) were home got to hear my half of the phone conversation.
Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:21 pm (UTC)
<coughs, approaches the mike> DJ, if you would, Prince and When Doves Cry. Thank you.
dr34m 1f j00 c4n 4 n37w0rk
c0nn3x10nz 0f c0mpu73rz 1n p33r
mu$ik 7r4d3d ph0r phr33
t3hy ph33l t3h $0und
t3h $0und 0f .mp3
h0w k4n j00 ju57 l34v3 m3 p1n913$$
4 g33k 1n 4 w0r1d 7h47 bl0wz
m4yb3 3y3 4m 700 u53d 70 p4nd3r1n9
m4yb3 m3h POTS 1$ 700 $l0w
m4yb3 t3h RIAA 1$ 1ik3 m3h 91rl
$h3'z n3v3r $471$ph13d
y d0 j00 $kr34m wh3n j00 r34d 7h1$
7h1$ i$ wh47 i7 $0undz l1k3
wh3n 3n9l1$h 734ch3rz kry
Monday, September 1st, 2008 09:26 pm (UTC)
I think I'm glad I don't know the song. That way it can't possibly create an earworm. :)
Monday, September 1st, 2008 10:12 pm (UTC)
Filkers. You try spraying, you try setting traps....
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008 02:09 am (UTC)
The TSA stupidity is magnificent, even for the federal bureaucracy. Another symptom of confusing motion with action. The inherent injustice in just having a list of citizens, for any purpose, is beyond my ability to be reasonable about. (I am thinking of the French list of gun owners that the Germans found so useful in WWII.)

All the electronic coding is just another form of cant. Various cants have been around since people have tried to communicate in public places without being understood. Every generation finds it's own ways of circumventing parental understanding. (Or local constabulary understanding.)

If thought of properly, any trade specific vocabulary can be thought of as a cant. I recently heard that math has become so specialized and compartmentalized that those who study sin(x) and Cos(x) can no longer understand each other's work.
Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008 11:55 am (UTC)
Is the TSA article describing domestic U.S. flights? The reason I ask is that when I fly out of Toronto, the system described by the author to get around the no-fly rulse would fail at the gate. As you board the plane, you must present valid boarding pass and a photo id....which they then match against the list of booked passengers. Unless I had a fake id, (which is of course quite possible), I wouldn't get on the flight.