Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 11:11 am

So you thought LED lights were the most energy-efficient lighting coming to market, huh?  Guess again.  An outfit called Luxim has a new gas-plasma light technology they call LiFi.  The new LiFi bulb is the size of a gel capsule, and delivers 140 lumens of instant-on, very high visual quality light per watt with very little waste heat.  (Compare that to around 10-12 lumens per watt for an incandescent bulb, 13-15 for halogen, 35-40 for compact fluorescent bulbs, or about 80-90 lumens per watt for the brightest production LEDs.  Wikipedia has a handy reference table here.)

Thursday, March 20th, 2008 05:00 pm (UTC)
So, can we buy them at the local hardware store?

(Can't buy LED units there, either.)

Also, the switch from type to type saves fewer watts each time. Going from incandescent to CF saves 60 watts, from CF to LED saves 8 watts per...
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 06:27 pm (UTC)
So, can we buy them at the local hardware store?
I wish. But apparently you can, or soon will be able to, buy them in your projection TV.
Also, the switch from type to type saves fewer watts each time. Going from incandescent to CF saves 60 watts, from CF to LED saves 8 watts per...
True. But you save a lot of power if you're going directly from incandescent to these, without the mercury disposal issue of CFLs.
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 06:33 pm (UTC)
Mercury is why I'd rather use LEDs, plus the bit about lights such as in bathrooms, where you only have them on for ten minutes or less. CF uses _more_ energy in that kind of application.
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 06:51 pm (UTC)
Y'know, Mythbusters actually did a segment on that. They looked at how long lights of different types need to be on to "amortize" the startup power surge. The specific target myth was the one that says "if you're leaving a room with fluorescent lights for longer than N minutes, it costs more energy to switch the lights off and turn them back on when you come back in than it does to just leave them on" (for various cited values of N ranging from about 3 to 15).

CFLs were, I think, the longest of the types they tested ... but it still only took something on the order of one second.
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 07:09 pm (UTC)
Okay, perhaps my info is out of date -- it came from architectural lighting sources, but maybe ten or fifteen years back. CF units with the straight tubes, rather than the curlicue type now on the market. Still have a couple of those in use.
Saturday, March 22nd, 2008 03:12 am (UTC)
I think the switch to solid-state electronic ballasts made a huge difference there.
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 06:34 pm (UTC)
Projection TV? What's that?