Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 01:29 pm

From Yahoo Finance:

Only a small percentage of communication involves actual words: 7%, to be exact.  In fact, 55% of communication is visual (body language, eye contact) and 38% is vocal (pitch, speed, volume, tone of voice).  The world's best business communicators have strong body language: a commanding presence that reflects confidence, competence, and charisma.

So we Aspies can count on getting across the 7% that is verbal, plus probably some varying fraction of the 38% that is vocal. The somatic 55%, we can mostly write off as lost. If we assume that on average we're getting half of the vocal content, we're getting about 26% of the total communication bandwidth ... barely more than a quarter of the total gestalt.  Even if we get all of the vocal and some fraction of the somatic, we still don't get much over 50% of the total stream.

No wonder we have trouble communicating.

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 07:41 pm (UTC)
I have seen those numbers before. Just think of how much brainpower you are expending just to keep up in a verbal datastream.
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 09:20 pm (UTC)
Not to mention the constant background process wondering "Yeah, that's what [s]he said, but what did [s]he actually mean?"
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007 04:42 am (UTC)
I suspect that happens to everybody.
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 11:33 pm (UTC)
Well, you might be only able to process 25% of the bandwidth, but that will be less than 25% of the gestalt, since that's nonlinear. So it sucks even worse.
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007 12:57 am (UTC)
True. I was trying not to over-analyse the problem.
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007 04:28 am (UTC)
Yet other articles use different percentages. Depends, I believe, on looking at total activated neuron pathways vs. differentially activated pathways, and on other experimental items.

All-in-all, I'd suggest using less mental power analyzing the meta-conversation during the conversation, and instead use it to watch for their eyes or shoulders changing to see when they're engaged in your statements.
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007 11:47 pm (UTC)
It certainly explains why the internet is so prone to miscommunication, too. And that 55% visual goes with why I don't like telephone communication... So there are a lot of communication traps that don't even involve Asperger's. If you think about it, modern technology might have helped level the playing field a little.