Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Astronomy humor (calling [profile] dr_nebula)

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 12:16 pm

Astronomy-geek humor that [livejournal.com profile] dr_nebula would probably appreciate:

<Alaric>  hmm, new unaided-eye-visible nova in Scorpius

<Alaric>  but James Nicoll appears to be confusing novae with type A supernovae

<chrispypa>  type A are the overachievers?

<tocotox>  what's the fixer-upper type?

<Alaric>  Cepheid variables  :)

Tags:
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 05:29 pm (UTC)
Am I?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova

(Ritual admission that there are better sources)
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 05:48 pm (UTC)
Hm, that's the first time I've ever seen an accretion mechanism described for a nova. Every other source I've seen (including Wikipedia itself) says that's the mechanism of a type 1a (not type A, my error) supernova (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova#Type_Ia).

If we're lucky, [livejournal.com profile] dr_nebula will jump in and clarify this. :)

(hint, hint, Doc. Yeah, YOU. Help us out here.)
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 05:56 pm (UTC)
Ah, actually, I see the difference here ... it depends on the rate and extent of the accretion, which can yield either a deflagration front throughout the star or only a surface explosion.

So this is a nova (as distinct from supernova) mechanism that's new to me. This raises the interesting question, then, of what governs which way it goes ... why do some white dwarfs burn off their accreted gas in a surface explosion, while others go on to become a Type 1a supernova? It appears it's a question of the specific atomic makeup of the accreted matter. Hydrogen accretion burns off easily and produces a nova, heavier elements resist fusion long enough to accumulate enough mass to create a Type 1a supernova.

Doc? Do I have this right?
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 06:30 pm (UTC)
Yeah - once their accumlated mass exceeds 1.4 solar, the white dwarf implodes and a supernova is formed.
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 06:29 pm (UTC)
This mechanism has been known for some time. This is why nova are often recurring with the same star.
Tuesday, February 20th, 2007 06:58 pm (UTC)
I was just saying it was new to me as a nova mechanism. But I'm not a serious astronomy geek.