Astronomy humor (calling
dr_nebula)
Astronomy-geek humor that dr_nebula would probably appreciate:
<Alaric> hmm, new unaided-eye-visible nova in Scorpius
<Alaric> but James Nicoll appears to be confusing novae with type A supernovae
<chrispypa> type A are the overachievers?
<tocotox> what's the fixer-upper type?
<Alaric> Cepheid variables :)
Tags:
no subject
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova
(Ritual admission that there are better sources)
no subject
If we're lucky,
(hint, hint, Doc. Yeah, YOU. Help us out here.)
no subject
So this is a nova (as distinct from supernova) mechanism that's new to me. This raises the interesting question, then, of what governs which way it goes ... why do some white dwarfs burn off their accreted gas in a surface explosion, while others go on to become a Type 1a supernova? It appears it's a question of the specific atomic makeup of the accreted matter. Hydrogen accretion burns off easily and produces a nova, heavier elements resist fusion long enough to accumulate enough mass to create a Type 1a supernova.
Doc? Do I have this right?
no subject
no subject
no subject