Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, December 28th, 2006 04:00 pm

A centrifuge-based gun with no sound, no heat, no mechanical wear, no recoil even when firing .50-caliber projectiles at up to 8000fps at up to 120,000rpm cyclic, that cannot jam ...

Um, excuse me.  But.  This article was supposed to be published on April 1, right....?

Update:

[livejournal.com profile] phanatic, a poster on the [livejournal.com profile] guns thread, calculated the power requirements of this weapon from the specs claimed by the crank inventor and assuming perfect 100% efficiency.  Using those assumptions, he came up with a sustained power consumption of 100MW -- approximately 134,000 horsepower.

Noiseless?  Heatless?  Portable?  .... Yeah, RIGHT.

Friday, December 29th, 2006 08:15 am (UTC)
okay, yes. releasing the kinetic energy pressed against the side of your centrifuge at one point is going to create a small imbalance opposite that point- but to maintain a rate of fire, you have to be adding another ball into the mix, which would alleviate that.

No it won't, because the new ball you're adding isn't up to speed yet. So in addition to the reaction from the ball you've just released, there's the rotational drag of getting the new ball spun up.
The force being removed isn't going to be enough to matter to a 28 pound weapon, for sure.

From a single ball, you might not notice it. But it's still there. With a weapon firing as many as 2,000 balls per second, you most definitely will. Trust me on this, there WILL be a recoil force, and it won't be small. You can't just "account for" conservation of momentum through a clever design. The inventor is a crank, and his claims for this weapon are every bit as bogus, if perhaps slightly less obviously so, than those for every "perpetual motion machine" ever invented. There's ways to cheat recoil and not pass it on to the firer or mount point by ejecting a countermass (be it gas, as in a recoilless rifle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recoilless_rifle), or plastic strips as in the Armbrust 300 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armbrust)), but there's no way to construct a projectile weapon that does not produce any recoil forces in the first place that doesn't require obtaining an exemption from compliance with the physical laws of this Universe. Even the sling you mentioned earlier has recoil.