Well, we weren't, but we will. Carly Fiorina's salary, specifically.
Get this: She took home a salary of $1.4 million, up from $1 million in 2001 and 2002. She took home a bonus of $2.1 million on top of that, down from $2.9 million in 2002. She also raked in 700,000 shares in stock options, and declined an additional retention bonus of $2 million that she was eligible for.
And on top of this, she received an additional $170,000 -- probably two to four people's salaries depending on deniority and location -- in "other compensation", including "payment for company-required personal use of HP aircraft" (such a hardship, that, having to fly the brand-new corporate Lears, or was it Gulfstreams, instead of flying cattle-class on Southwest with the rest of us mere peons) and mortgage assistance?!?!?
Lemme see if I have this straight. She pulls down $3.4 million in combined salary and bonus, and she needs mortgage assistance? What's she doing, buying the frelling Palace at Versailles?
no subject
*sigh* My folks paid $39,900 for their house. These days, this coast, that's a good sized *down payment*.
Sure, Carly's take is outrageous. I'm not arguing that. I'm just venting about what the dot-boom has done to the owner-housing market in the past fifteen years. (At least the *rents* are going down... )
no subject
no subject
One thing I've noticed is that people who have lots of money, don't let opportunities slide. if HPAQ has a program for mortgage assistance to help the people with low salaries, they probably just didn't add a salary cap to it. Granted she should be fixing that not taking advantage of it, but it's a "perk" to working for HPAQ that there is mortgage assistance available.
Tough luck to people making reasonabl eincomes that don't look for the extra dimes available.
no subject
no subject
As I said, as CEO she should be FIXING the lack of salary cap/need adjustment not taking advantage of it.
Yes.