Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, September 26th, 2006 12:19 pm

A U.S. House of Representatives panel said Monday that it has asked the chief executives of six major telecommunications companies to testify in its probe of the legally questionable practice of "pretexting," which involves tricking a business into disclosing information by posing as someone else.

I love that euphemism.  "Legally questionable."  In pretty much any other "civilized" nation, or if it involved pretty much any other kind of records, there'd be a much shorter name for it:  FRAUD.  Where does the whacked-out idea come from that it's a crime to masquerade as somebody else to get their money or their medical records, say, but not their phone records?

A few other news bits for this morning:

Tuesday, September 26th, 2006 07:41 pm (UTC)
There are actually a couple new lithium battery chemistries now available which are much safer than the old lithium-ion or lithium-polymer batteries. Lithium-manganese oxide is one of these chemistries, as is Lithium-ion phosphate - these have made lithium-based rechargable batteries as safe as standard lead-acid or Ni(Cd|Mh).
Tuesday, September 26th, 2006 08:47 pm (UTC)
I'll willingly concede the battery pack catching fire comment was slightly facetious. :)
Wednesday, September 27th, 2006 01:19 am (UTC)
Actually, that's not a euphemism. It is a correct legal description of the morass the committee is trying to wade through.

Pretexting is federally illegal ... if you're getting someone's financial records. If it's phone records, it's not currently a federal crime. It's also legally not identity theft - which is currently written only to outlaw _using_ someone's identifying info to _commit_ a crime. It's a legal limbo.

And, it's not FRAUD unless there's a law against it - which there isn't.

Is it unethical? YES. immoral? YES. Should it be made illegal? Again, YES.

The laws always lag behind the technology, Alaric. Rather than castigating Congress for not having solved it already, you should be congratulating them on being as on top of things as they are - the committee has been meeting for months on this issue, long before the HP scandal brought the whole hoopla into the news.

Wednesday, September 27th, 2006 03:22 am (UTC)
retexting is federally illegal ... if you're getting someone's financial records. If it's phone records, it's not currently a federal crime. It's also legally not identity theft - which is currently written only to outlaw _using_ someone's identifying info to _commit_ a crime. It's a legal limbo.

And, it's not FRAUD unless there's a law against it - which there isn't.

.....In the US. Another area in which US law currently falls down.

the committee has been meeting for months on this issue, long before the HP scandal brought the whole hoopla into the news.

Well, actually, they pretty much dropped it once when the telcos wanted it swept under the rug. Now that it's been brought to the public eye in a high-profile case, they have little choice but to address it.
Wednesday, September 27th, 2006 04:12 am (UTC)
Just saw the video of Ian Wright in the Wrightspeed X1... is he an Australian, or a New Zealander? I can't quite pick which from his accent.
Wednesday, September 27th, 2006 10:51 am (UTC)
You'd be more likely to be able to tell than I would. :)