Technically, we have a TV¹. It's a Pioneer 46" 4:3 back-projection NTSC TV. It's also still in North Carolina, twelve years old, and needs its front screen replaced for the second time (because of damage inflicted by small people, also for the second time), which will probably cost around $400 even assuming parts are still available. Doesn't seem like a good investment in a 12-year-old TV.
Costco has a coupon special good through this Sunday offering a $300 discount on this Vizio 42" direct-view LCD HDTV. Right now, it appears that direct-view LCD is the technology to go with in a large-screen TV. Direct-view LCD TVs have a wide viewing angle, low power draw, low heat output, good brightness, do not rely on short-lived halogen bulbs (which are often vendor-proprietary and cost as much as $500 each), and are typically on the order of 4" thick (and therefore readily wall-mountable).
Downside: The Vizio unit does not natively display 1080i, but down-converts it to 720p (its native physical resolution is 1366x768, rather than the 1920x1080 required to natively display 1080i broadcasts).
Then again, neither does anything else under $3000 in that size, so far as I can tell. I have found exactly three HDTVs under $3000 that natively support 1080i/1080p resolution. Two are 37" sets: the Planar XP37W at about $2000, and the Westinghouse LVM-37W3 (which is a pure monitor and requires a separate tuner even for NTSC/ATSC) at about $1200. The third is JVC's 40" LT-40FN97, which has an MSRP of $3499 but can be had for $2600 online. It tunes ATSC and QAM internally, but apparently not NTSC. The Vizio, at $1299 until tomorrow, tunes all three and is larger than any of the sub-$3000 1920x1080 units.
For an almost 3:1 price differential for the same screen size, I think we could stand to forego native 1080i resolution.
[1] Well, technically, we have two. We were given an old Sharp CRT set in the 19" range with only composite NTSC input, a missing power button, and a screen about as curved as a football. The kids use it to watch videotapes of The Magic Schoolbus and the like.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
SpeedvisionSpeed TVThe Speed Channel or whatever they're calling it now might as well, at this point, simply be renamed the NASCAR Channel. I'm not sure they broadcast Formula 1 or motorcycle racing at all any more.no subject
no subject
no subject
Personally, I miss being without a tv. But I'm so bad at it, that I'm likely soon to buy a tv tuner / monitor for my "office" even though I live alone and can walk to the other room in < 3 seconds.
no subject
no subject
720p is no big deal--that's what nearly all LCD HDTVs deplay, as you found. For TV or gaming, you won't care. Even for computer display, 720p is OK for a living room.
no subject
Nothing says we're locked into it forever, and if we try it out and find we hate it, we can always take it back.
Either way, they were out of stock, so we have a 30-day raincheck to think it over.
no subject
Good point on returning it, but my own experience is that once it's in the entertainment center, you never get around to it. :)
no subject
no subject
That said, for about $80 more than the regular, non-sale price of the Vizio, we can get a Westinghouse LWM42W2 LCD HDTV monitor (https://www.westinghousedigital.com/pc-44-7-42-1080p-monitor.aspx). The Westinghouse is a pure monitor with no tuner; on the other hand, around here, we're told TV reception pretty much implies either cable or satellite, which means anything we're going to be driving it with will already have a tuner. It's a couple hundred dollars more than the Vizio; on the other hand, it's full 1080p-capable, with native 1920x1080 resolution, it has better contrast ratio, and it's a known brand name. It only has one HDMI input vs. the Vizio's two ... on the other hand, really, how many do you need, with an A/V receiver? It has wimpy 10w internal speakers ... on the other hand, hooked up to the A/V system, we'll probably never even use them anway. I never used the internal speakers on my 46" Pioneer back-projection TV.
no subject
That looks like a terrific choice.
no subject
What I need to do is find a deal like I got on my Pioneer -- last of line, discontinued model, display model, Fourth of July sale, all stacking to yield a final price of $1200 on a 46" back-projection TV in 1994.
no subject
Still, nothing beats the picture quality of a good CRT.
no subject
I'd suggest mounting the unit in such a way the kids cannot touch it. Buy them there own remote and when they break it let them go for a month without TV. :)
no subject
no subject
With a thin-and-flat screen, it won't be a problem. We're thinking of putting it above the mantel, over the fireplace in the upstairs living room at the house. This will also mean small people running around the room will not interrupt line-of-sight for people watching the TV -- no more "Hey! DOWN IN FRONT!"
no subject
no subject