ilcylic linked to this article by Jonathan Schell, "Too Late for Empire", reprinted with permission from The Nation, in which it will appear in print in the August 14-21 issue.
It makes interesting reading. I recommend that you go read it too. It may make you think.
no subject
He does point out some of the relative hypocrisy of King George, some of it false, but enough true to make the point.
Is he saying that the single party government is less effective that the two party government we had for Tricky Dicky's capers? (Note for history, Nixon was on McCarthy's senate "Anti-American Affairs" committee.)
His main point seems to, obliquely, say that we cannot ever defeat, or even significantly inconvenience, transnational groups dedicated to killing our civilians. Oddly enough, he does not mention Afghanistan.
Make me think? Perhaps. I prefer to watch Hugo Chavez for a bit longer before I accept his argument. I suspect that a sufficiently ruthless country could make empire work today. A significantly humane country, like the US, where most government workings are eventually transparent, could never do it. I agree with that.
no subject
no subject
Also, I think you forgot religious righteousness and fervor for conversion (excuse me, "salvation") of the heathens.
no subject
(P.S: "Heathen" and proud of it)