No, I'm not talking about Schlock Mercenary. olafthunderfoot found this report, which asserts that the US Department of Defense has finally ditched the Beretta M9 (after 20 years of reliability issues and unsatisfactory performance in the field), and is going back to a .45 pistol. SOCOM has been tasked with finding the M9's replacement, to be designated the Joint Combat Pistol.
I think I know a lot of grunts who are going to be very happy with this decision.
(For Schlock fans, here's some classic BLAM from the archives.)
no subject
-Ogre
no subject
no subject
I just like 10mm and wanted to see military surplus ammo.
-Ogre
no subject
no subject
no subject
-Ogre
no subject
Now, 155gr at 1400 I could believe; Georgia Arms rates theirs at 1375, and they tend to be just a half-notch off CorBon for speed and a half-notch up for accuracy, at least in my experience.
I tend towards the bigger round in colder climes, but that's just me... that and I'm not trying to nail anything at more than 15 yards or so, so trajectory and time of flight... meh. If I was, I would run the curves for velocity vs. weight vs. range and see which one gave me most energy on target...
no subject
Barrel length helps, too.
-Ogre
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I know just the thing. The Glock 21. Assuming, of course, that it's as good as the late-model 17's are. While I have a problem personally with striker-fired weapons, there are a few things that a Glock will do that most other weapons won't... like, feed wadcutters, or (with special LEO-equipment) fire underwater. And the smaller combat tupperware is already field-tested.
Of course, I imagine a helluva lot of people are going to do what a goodly number have already done - go get a 1911 like
G-dJohn Moses Browning intended in the first place... although the mods I would make on one for use as a soldier's sidearm are a lot different from those carrying as, well, anyone else... looser tolerances in certain places, for one. I don't want just one little grit of sand to jam the weapon. (Kalashnikov-engineered weapons are famous for working in the desert where these damn tinker-toy weapons they give our side screw up.)no subject
no subject
If that's your thought, I dunno. I remember being out in the New Mexico desert once, I had a 1911, and my friend had a G21. We were playing kick-the-can, and swapped weapons. I did better *the first time* with his weapon than I had with my own, which I had been practicing with for a year.
The '21 is a fair bit heavier than the '17, even relatively speaking. Personally, I do like the way the 1911 fills my hand, and I'm not a big fan of striker-fired weapons, either. But still. Soldiers do a lot of things to weapons us civillians would never do. Different application, different weapon.
no subject
no subject
As I said, dif'rent strokes.... a fellow I once knew was partial to a little .380 mouse gun known as a "Grendel"... it was only 15oz empty, and while his Chewbacca-sized paws could hang on to the thing, I couldn't; it would strain the web of my hand. Much prefer something about twice that weight...
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject