Um, wait just a minute here ........... is it just me, or is there a slight problem with consistency in this statement? Given that Islamic Shari'a law institutionalizes and mandates discrimination against women, how can the new Iraqi constitution both forbid laws that "go against Islamic tenets" AND, simultaneously, forbid discrimination against women and mandate religious freedom?
I suspect this relies upon a highly Shari'a-influenced definition of the phrases "discrimination against women" and "religious freedom." Unless, of course, any part of this is lies and spin being told to save face for the administration.
no subject
Ugliness, but hey.
no subject
On the extremeist-left side, some variants still permit slavery of non-Islamic peoples and total restrictions against women (not even being allowed outside the house except escorted by their husband or his brother[s]).
On the extremeist-right side, there are some variants that are totally against violence in any form (to the point that adherants are vegetarian), and women can 'marry' together (not men, just women, for economic reasons, and they aren't supposed to have lesbian sex [but it is permissible under some circumstances]).
no subject
Yup. What it means to be Muslim is as widely varied as what it means to be Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, or Pagan.