This is looking like I may end up in an awkward position. Convergys (in Reston, VA) has said they're going to make a decision by Jan 1, and my inside contact told me his boss was drooling after my interview. However, it seems nothing's going to happen on my other job prospect, Ceva-DSP (in San Jose, CA) until mid-January.
Thing is, if I end up with the choice of both, there's good reasons why I might prefer Ceva-DSP -- but it looks like if Convergys comes up with an offer, I'm going to have to decide on it before the interview with Ceva-DSP comes up. Granted, one guy just joined Convergys, then left two days later when Sprint made him a better offer, but I don't feel comfortable doing that. On the other hand, if I say no to Convergys, and then something happens and monkeywrenches Ceva-DSP .... that'd be Bad.
I dislike this situation intensely.
But one way or another, we have to get out of this rat-hole.
no subject
When you get the first job offer (assuming that happens) you won't yet have the other information, so you'd be guessing.
This boils down to risk analysis. You have two risks you are worried about. One, you might get both jobs, and have to choose between staying at the first job or treating them badly. Two, you might turn down the first job and fail to get the second job, leaving you without employment.
So, which is worse? Having a job and being offered a better job, or not having any job at all?
Sounds like you aren't the only one affected by the choice, so it seems pretty obvious that you should take the first job offer you get, then figure out what to do if you've got two job offers once you get there. Anything else is high risk.
no subject
no subject