Yeah, everyone knows the standard joking alternate expansion of PETA: People Eating Tasty Animals. But I was thinking about PETA and its actual positions and policies, and realized that there is another alternative expansion that actually reflects their core philosophies much better — and, frankly, more honestly — than their own canonical name does.
People for the Extermination of Tainted Animals.
Think about it. PETA spokesdroids talk a good and noble-sounding talk in media interviews, but their actual policies as demonstrated by their actions basically amount to ethnic cleansing for animals. Their stated goal is the extinction, in the current generation, of all animals that have been tainted by contact with humans. All pets, all domesticated animals, any animal bred for scientific or medical purposes, any animal farmed for meat, milk, furs, fiber — they're all on PETA's extermination list. For their own good and the greater good, of course. (It's always for the greater good, isn't it?)
I'm sure it would be quite redundant to mention the obvious historical analogies with regard to humans.
Just as a thought experiment, in seven words: How untainted is untainted enough to live? How many species of animal life are there on this planet that have not been affected in SOME way by contact with humans?