....now acrostics are apparently being considered to be poems for school homework purposes. Give me a break .... an acrostic is a word puzzle.
I suddenly find myself with a new-hatched dread of waking up one day to find that "Cat, dog shit oops I ment cow" [misspelling intentional] is now considered a poem. The criterion of poetry seems to have dropped to "If someone, somewhere, regardless of whether or not they know anything about poetry or even about grammatically correct English, says it's a poem, then it's a poem."
Come back, Vogons, all is forgiven. At least the "freddled gruntbuggly" poem had ... something. (I'm not certain what it was, nor whether I really want to find out, but it had something.)
Oh freddled gruntbuggly, thy micturations are to me
As plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee.
Groop, I implore thee, my foonting turlingdromes
And hooptiously drangle me with crinkly bindlewurdles,
Or I will rend thee in the gobberwarts with my blurglecruncheon, see if I don't!
Clarification: I am taking issue not with the idea that an acrostic can be a poem, but with the idea that merely being an acrostic is sufficient on its own to qualify a collection of words as a poem, which is about as silly as saying that having doors is sufficient to classify an object as a car -- the quality "has doors", as a distinguishing attribute of car-dom, is neither necessary, nor sufficient. So it is with "is an acrostic" and poetry.
no subject
no subject
In that case...
Re: In that case...
Re: In that case...
My heartfelt sympathies are diluted by knowing I'm not alone. Just wait till she's 15 and has learned a million more ways to dodge, delay, and wear you out.
Maybe you've lost this battle; maybe you should retreat now and cut your losses. Inspiration's capricious; a father's stubbornness and persistence have little chance of evoking it.
no subject
This acrostic about George Washington (http://www.geocities.com/stlaasr/article-11-2002.html) isn't one I remembered from class, but it does show that acrostics have been considered poetry for at least 200 years. And this article at About.com (http://puzzles.about.com/library/weekly/aa000117.htm) lists an example of acrostic poetry dating back to the 1500s.
And an article at a Worldwide Church of God site (http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/poet/psalms3.htm) claims that acrostic poetry even appears in the Bible:
no subject
My point exactly (though I evidently didn't state it clearly enough). While an acrostic can be a poem, being an acrostic is in and of itself neither necessary nor sufficient to be a poem.
no subject
I'll admit I prefer the haiku form. I once wrote one about donuts.
no subject
As for haiku .... we did tech support completely in haiku for about half an hour in undernet #callahans once. :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Twas brillig and the slithy tothes
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe...
no subject
"Monkeys fishing words out of a jar." Yep, that fits a lot of so-called "poetry" I've seen.