Once again, something rotten in the District of Columbia

[unixronin]

Republicans in the House are pushing to permanently kill the estate tax.  How are they planning to make up the budget shortfall?  Apparently by refusing to fund veterans' care.  (blackthornglade reports that they're also helping trim the veterans' healthcare budgets by "reclassifying" thousands of veterans, including those disabled from injuries received fighting in America's wars, as "reservists" ineligible for VA benefits.)

Now it may be just me, but it shouldn't matter worth a damn if you're a reservist.  If you're called up by your country to go off to fight in a war that means little or nothing to you personally, and you come home from it wounded or disabled, your country had bloody well better be willing to cover your associated medical bills -- and if anyone in your government looks the other way and says "That's not our problem", they should rapidly cease to be members of the government.  In fact, I venture to suggest they should find themselves drafted as privates on the front line of that same war.

It's bad enough to vote to send people off to do a job that you're unwilling to do yourself because it's too dirty or too dangerous.  It's worse to do so when you basically have to lie to come up with a rationalization for that job that anyone will believe.  But to then cheat your troops out of medical care, when they come home wounded or maimed, is nothing short of reprehensible.

Tell me again why we allow these swine to remain in office....?

Comments

Re: Much as I hate to admit it...

[unixronin.livejournal.com]

...the reason why we allow these cockroaches (please don't insult pigs) to remain in power is that the alternative is Civil War. Things just haven't gotten bad enough yet to make that option palatable.

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but it's too soon to start shooting the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe

Personally, I'm not too sure about that second part. In fact, I find myself sometimes thinking things have been allowed to go rather too far already. On the other hand, I'll add to McVeigh's errors that he was also, IMHO and TTBOMK, motivated by the wrong reasons; and also I'll state that I'd have grave reservations about a post-second-revolution America that could find no-one better to raise as a martyr than Timothy McVeigh. That seems to me far too close to condoning the slaughter of innocents -- and the fact is, the people in that building were innocents.

The gripping hand is, all evidence seems to indicate that, through wilful inaction and alerts knowingly not passed on, Federal law enforcement was as responsible for the deaths at Oklahoma City as McVeigh and Nichols were. They had warnings from the Militia of Montana; they chose to disregard them because the source was politically incorrect. They had warnings from an informer; they chose to disregard them because she was technically under the authority of a different agency. And we'll probably never know why it was that ATF declined to pass on the warning it is reported they received, but chose instead to arrange for their people to be out of the building that day but not warn anyone else.

(I have nasty suspicions about the above. I have speculated more than once that events took place as they did because one can make more political capital out of a terrorist bombing on US soil than from the same bombing averted by a timely arrest.)