Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Saturday, October 2nd, 2004 06:57 pm

Proposed:  that Times Roman[1] is one of the most horrible, butt-ugly, and difficult to read typefaces in current wide use ever devised by the fertile mind of man[2], particularly when displayed on a computer screen possessing limited resolution[3] or when used in small point sizes, and that its use for essentially any purpose requiring legibility should be deprecated.

Discuss.


[1]  Plus, of course, its family of related faces such as Times New Roman (Monotype's name for the face; Times Roman is Linotype's name) and their look-alikes.

[2]  Historical note:  Times Roman was originally developed by the Times newspaper, in order to jam as much text as was humanly possible with then-existing printing technology onto a sheet of cheap, poor-quality newsprint paper while still retaining some semblance of readability.

[3]  Relative to print; my screen is around 110dpi.

Saturday, October 2nd, 2004 10:22 pm (UTC)
Your footnote [2] indicates that clear legibility was a prime design goal. I still find it satisfied -- on print medium, that is.

On display screen with limited resolution and small point sizes your complaint is valid in my opinion, too.
Saturday, October 2nd, 2004 10:38 pm (UTC)
Well, tolerable legibility was a design goal, anyway. It was, IMHO, compromised by the heavy visual weight necessary to ensure that characters printed reasonably clearly on coarse newsprint-grade paper with easily-smudged newspaper inks.
Saturday, October 2nd, 2004 11:09 pm (UTC)
Does that mean we shouldn't use it to make fake 70s-era memos about Bush's National Guard service? Or do you mean that's the only thing it's good for?
Sunday, October 3rd, 2004 10:28 am (UTC)
heh. :)
I'm not sure there's any purpose I'd say it's a good font for. There's probably some it's tolerable for.
Monday, October 4th, 2004 08:27 am (UTC)
I like Copperplates for legibility, myself.
Monday, October 4th, 2004 09:15 am (UTC)
Yup, a good copperplate face can be beautifully clear. But think of their origins -- if you're putting that kind of work into something, you're not going to do it in an ugly or unreadable face.