I haven't see the full announcement, but will do so. (Thanks for the link.) The main thing I've heard from the White House about the nomination is "the Supreme Court needs her empathy" and "You can't oppose this nomination without being racist", and those seem to be the main things that the mass media — who still haven't stopped fawning over Obama, and can thus be inferred likely to portray the nomination in a favorable light — keep repeating.
The points you make are valid, and that is a positive sign. As noted elsewhere, the Ricci v. Stefani ruling is not as it has been elsewhere represented. Nevertheless, I'm still bothered by her implication that her background automatically makes her experience more valid, and her decisions more correct, than anyone who doesn't share that background.
As for Limbaugh, I honestly couldn't care less what that ass chooses to bloviate about. He's almost, but not quite, as self-discrediting as Michael Savage.
no subject
The points you make are valid, and that is a positive sign. As noted elsewhere, the Ricci v. Stefani ruling is not as it has been elsewhere represented. Nevertheless, I'm still bothered by her implication that her background automatically makes her experience more valid, and her decisions more correct, than anyone who doesn't share that background.
As for Limbaugh, I honestly couldn't care less what that ass chooses to bloviate about. He's almost, but not quite, as self-discrediting as Michael Savage.