As I've previously alluded to more than once, a large proportion of the calls I get on my cell phone that are not from cymrullewes are wrong numbers. Most of them are attempts to reach a William Brown, who operates a business called Precision Networking, but who moved from New Hampshire to San Antonio, Texas a few years ago, and never bothered to update many of his business listings in this part of the country. (Sudden side thought: it'd be amusing if it was to turn out that this was the same William Brown I once worked with at a former employer in California.)
So anyway, I've received two such wrong-number calls this morning. The second one, when told about Mr. Brown moving to San Antonio and not updating his listings, replied "I can beat that! He's shipping his boat to my boatyard, and didn't even bother to tell us!"
Speaking of the intersection of phoniness and annoyances, dafydd points to a GeoTimes report which confirms something I've long asserted — in our modern technological society, "Daylight Savings Time" may "save" daylight, but not only does it not save energy, it actually increases overall energy usage. Although DST saves on lighting power consumption, the saving is outweighed by increases in power consumed by heating and cooling, by a sufficient margin that overall electrical power consumption increases by 1% to 4% when DST is implemented. (I predict that this disparity will become more pronounced as incandescent lights are replaced by more energy-efficient lighting systems using as much as six times less power.) Overall, residents of the State of Indiana paid a total of $8.6 million more for energy after Indiana adopted DST in 2006 — and $1.6 million to $5.3 million more to clean up damage from related increases in pollution.
The Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting its own study of the effect of the 2005 extension of DST on energy use. Although Congress passed the 2005 law, it also required that DOE study the extension’s impact, and retained the right to repeal the extension pending the results. The study, begun in late 2007 after DOE finished compiling data on hourly electricity use from utility companies, will be completed at the end of June, according to DOE spokesperson Chris Kielich.
Tell you what. How about instead of repealing the extension, we just repeal DST all together? Then we can all just set our clocks once AND QUIT SCREWING AROUND WITH THEM. The fact is, we are in very large measure no longer a strictly daylight-driven society.
no subject
Granted, I'm not too fond of these 0520h sunrises we've been having, but it helps me wake up (I work 0700-1600).
(Apropos of your cell phone story: another "Bill <Lastname>" was the marketing director for the recently-retired "<Company> Inside" program. Now that he's left the company, I'm getting bits and pieces of his misdirected mail. Interesting stuff, that.)
no subject
I shudder to think about a 9:30 or 10pm sunset.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Then again, I'm in Seattle, so this isn't much of a surprise, either. 4th of July fireworks don't start until nearly quarter of 10 PM because it's not dark enough to see them until then. From mid-May until mid-September, kids go to bed in the daylight.
no subject
So I did the only logical thing when the change hit. Disregarded the patch, set my machines from Pacific Daylight into Mountain Standard, and proceeded to move to Arizona before we'd have to revert back.
I haven't touched it since. I also haven't seen Windows or any other OS freak out, haven't missed any appointments, haven't been an hour early to anything, and likewise, the people I work with all get to work at the right time.
I'd actually take it one step further, and take the opportunity to completely divorce civil time from daylight. Punt everyone onto UTC, and end the time zone mess too.
That said, living solely in ST is very refreshing.
The only annoying problem I have now is that everyone from outside Arizona or Indiana insists on using abbreviations like CST and EST when they mean CDT or EDT. They don't seem to understand that they are on daylight, not standard time, and just because they're not using it doesn't mean the offset changes.
no subject
no subject
Unix time!
no subject
no subject
It's hard to imagine it being used that way, though, for sure. Mainly because of the lack of correspondence to imagination.
Now, if we could set the day to 100 kiloseconds, THEN we could get somewhere. You could say "meet you at 52k tomorrow by the fountain".
no subject
(day a little over 28 hours, decimal clock, 10 divs of 100 segs of 100 seconds, one Grainne second about 1.018 Earth second)
no subject
yay let's redo the entirety of physics and engineering
no subject
no subject
no subject
Write your congresscritters (housie, and senators).
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
How?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
We can just move us, and the rest of the world can deal with it.
no subject
no subject