California Assembly Bill 1200 would change California's motorcycle helmet law to allow riders aged 18 and over to choose to ride without a helmet. Assemblyman John Longville (D-San Bernardino) of California has introduced an amendment to the bill which would make those who choose to ride helmetless automatic organ donors if killed in a crash.
Personally, I don't have too much of an ethical problem with this, as if they receive head injuries in a crash they'll expect medical treatment for their injuries. You don't want to be an organ donor, wear a frelling helmet.
What's your call?
Product placement: "Now he says, 'Mom, you named me after a box!' I say, 'Yeah, but it's a good, strong name.' " Is it just me, or do some of these parents need a good LARTing? I can't help but wonder how long it'll be before the first lawsuit from Disney for brand dilution.
The Blue Light: Dell and HP have lined up behind the Blu-Ray blue-laser DVD standard, joining Hitachi, LG Electronics, Philips Electronics, Sony and Thomson. However, the DVD Forum, an alliance of some 220 DVD companies including electronics and media firms, supports the rival technology from Toshiba and NEC. Well, maybe we'll end up with only two competing blue-laser DVD standards, instead of five for red-laser DVDs... the deciding factor may turn out to be which format Hollywood goes with, as they're expected to support only one.
Small potatoes: And you thought "disk spud" was just geek slang...
no subject
Granted- I'm in favor of universal health care anyway, but if the riders are going to expect medical assistance after refusing the most basic safety precaution, maybe they should also agree to be organ donors as a 'trade'
The idea of riding without a helmet at all is pretty dumb. I suppose it's not my place to say what another person does in general, but this really *does* affect the lives of others- it's like hitting the black clad person darting out across a 50mph highway in the middle of a rainy night- he's dead, and whether it's his fault or not, the driver STILL has to deal with a lifetime of 'I killed someone'.
no subject
You know me, free will it is
*AND* I'm an organ donor. Except for my brain, which goes to Parkinson's research if they want it (being genetically linked to 2 confirmed Parkinson's cases)
So yeah. Sure. If you're old enough to vote, you can vote with your body parts as far as I'm concerned, but if you're terminal, they should just take what they can and toss the rest into the bag for later movement into a coffin/incinerator.
But then again, once I'm done with my body, if my heart or liver or something could save a life, so be it! At least then if they had to scrape part of me up off the pavement I'd be able to pay them back by saving someone else's life.
Of course, I would add 1 little thing. Because People Are Stupid (tm), I'd like to somehow make sure people who opt out of helmets are Very Very Aware of what they are choosing.
Otherwise, I'm gonna go ballistic when some squid's mom starts crying in court about how her son/daughter didn't know.
names
Re: names
[Disclaimer: For reference, our two youngest daughters' names mean "White Phantom" (in Welsh) and "Queen Thistle" (in Irish Gaelic) respectively. The eldest's name apparently means "sun" in Spanish, but family belief is that it's of Norse origin.]
Re: names
-Ogre
Re: names
Re: names
no subject
Safety Equipment is optional, however, failure to use adequate safety presupposes that the user has opted out of any publicly supported medical services.
no subject
no subject
The "Safety Equipment" and "Adequate Safety" need to be clearly enumerated, and established by a reliable standards body.
(Yes I know that then the lobbying just moves to the standards body, but there has to be something, and I'd rather a standards body that wasn't up for re-election all the time.)
no subject
Mercedes was named after Herr Daimler's daughter. So, who knows, maybe those people are just using a traditional german name.
Other than that, my reaction is... "*sigh*"
-Ogre
no subject
no subject