Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 07:46 am

...is the "Quote" button.  Sure, it's a good idea.  But you can never tell quite what it's going to do.  If you select at least one complete paragraph of a post and click Quote, it's a fairly safe bet it'll blockquote it.  But if you select only part of a paragraph to quote, sometimes it'll blockquote, sometimes it'll put it in italics, sometimes it'll enclose it in double-quotes ... you click and take pot luck.

It'd be a lot more useful if it behaved consistently, and more useful still if you could define that behavior.

Thursday, August 18th, 2005 08:19 am (UTC)
LJ is F/OSS. Read the source.

-Ogre
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 08:55 am (UTC)
Well, yeah. There is that.
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 10:29 am (UTC)
I don't have a "quote" button. sounds like you must be using an LJ client or something. That would make it a gripe about an LJ client, but I can't tell which one.
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 10:50 am (UTC)
The Quote button exists when commenting. It's immediately above the "Message" box, and to the right. I bet you do have one, you just aren't noticing it.
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 10:59 am (UTC)
No, it is an LJ feature. It was added some time back. I've observed that it's not present on all journals, though. I assume this has to do with the style used for the journal -- possibly whether it's an S1 or S2 style.
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 11:37 am (UTC)
It'd be a lot more useful if it behaved consistently, and more useful still if you could define that behavior.
I didn't even realize LJ had a "quote" button until I read this. An' to think I've been doing it by hand all these years...

(Then again, given what you've written, I'll continue to do so.)
Thursday, August 18th, 2005 02:14 pm (UTC)
I tend to either let it do its quoting thing, then edit the tags to consistency, or ... yeah ... just do it by hand.
Friday, August 19th, 2005 11:17 pm (UTC)
I have no idea if you're using Firefox, but wouldn't Greasemonkey work for making this function the way you want it to?
Saturday, August 20th, 2005 10:53 am (UTC)
I'm not familiar with Greasemonkey. Enlighten me?