Goose checked out a book from the library today that, as far as I can tell from every glance I've gotten at it, appears to be composed entirely of simulated AIM transcripts. It's even laid out so each page looks like the author's idea of an AIM window. I have a creeping dread that by the time she finishes this "book" -- I hesitate to even call it that -- she'll be attempting to communicate entirely in acronyms and emoticons.
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
Style Credit
- Style: Blue for Drifting by Jennie Griner
- Resources: OSWD design
no subject
no subject
I know some of the recent sci-fi/cyberpunk literature have psuedo-IRC and email content. But they definetly don't comprise any significent fraction of the book even.
no subject
no subject
Lauren myracle (yes, like that on the cover, copyright Lauren Myracle)
no subject
I did a contract gig transcribing test sms messages for a company that was working on voice recognition software (yeah, I was hard up). The shit people wrote and the complete abuse of the English language made me hate the world for about 3 weeks.
Death to the emoticon users!
no subject
(oh, wait ..... hasn't that already HAPPENED...?)
no subject
no subject
no subject
I understand using BRB, BTW, WRT, LOL, and IIRR (IOW, phrases :-) but abbreviating a word to one letter bothers me.
Emoticons are shortcuts and as such have their places. It's like when someone asks if you are having fun and instead of saying yes you turn around and flash them a quick smile/grin.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And so do emoticons ..... :-p
#include <rants/wanted/comment-editing-feature.h>
no subject
my biggest bitches;
u for you
4 for four
2 for to, or too
people are lazy nowadays.
~hops off his soapbox and kicks it into the corner~
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Hmm, we have overloading, we have inheritance, we have "data hiding" ....)