Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Friday, July 15th, 2005 12:44 pm (UTC)
To REALLY play Devil's Advocate, one could suggest that drunken idiots shooting one another in brawls is a self-correcting problem. ;) Speaking strictly from the viewpoint of natural selection, I'm not entirely sure it would be such a bad thing as all that.
Friday, July 15th, 2005 02:13 pm (UTC)
I'd agree with you, but the natural selection thing only works if the idiots get themselves killed before they reproduce. In this day and age, we'd have to give legal alcohol and firearms to nine-year-olds to insure that.
Friday, July 15th, 2005 03:23 pm (UTC)
Sad, but increasingly true ....



Of course, we could always try (gasp!) raising kids to have a sense of personal responsibility. You know, like people USED to.
Friday, July 15th, 2005 04:50 pm (UTC)
What a concept!

Unfortunately, a downward spiral is much harder to break than un upward one. After a generation or two of bad education, who will teach the teachers?
Friday, July 15th, 2005 07:32 pm (UTC)
I'd like to think there's enough competent teachers still left in the system to bootstrap it again, if all the damned political-hack administrators and religion-driven Boards of Education were off their backs. For how much longer, though, I don't know.
Friday, July 15th, 2005 11:26 pm (UTC)
ah but think of all the therapists and shrinks that would be unemployed then!
Friday, July 15th, 2005 03:55 pm (UTC)
That only works where there's parity of idiocy since the gun-toting drunkards don't generally take themselves out. I suspect "natural selection" will claim more people who were stupid/unlucky enough to be next to the lone gun-toting idiot in the room when he gets drunk, which I think is not the effect you were after.
Friday, July 15th, 2005 04:05 pm (UTC)
Well, I did say I was playing devil's advocate. ;)
I actually agree that check-at-the-door is possibly a better solution ... though so far, the lesson of Florida, Vermont, Alaska et al seems to be that it really isn't a significant problem in the first place.

(Of course, with universal Vermont-style carry, the bar would be lowered somewhat, and that might no longer be true.)