First, we got Microsoft claiming that Linux infringes on 235 Microsoft patents and saying it expected royalties from distributors and users. But to the best of my recollection, MS has never once actually come up with a list of those 235 infringed patents so that anyone who wanted to could, like, try to avoid infringing them (or, conversely, verify whether the claim was actually true).
Then we got the promise from Microsoft "not to sue open-source developers for products that connect to Microsoft software".
But that's just a one-off. Honest! Microsoft isn't going to sue anyone else for using open-source. Or maybe they will. Their top IP lawyer "declined to say whether other suits over the open source operating system might follow".
Asked whether that meant that Microsoft would seek compensation from all products that use the Linux kernel, Gutierrez said, "No. That is really not what we have in mind. This case is about TomTom's infringement."
He stressed Microsoft's preference for signing licensing deals with companies, including those using Linux.
"Our position is and has been that we believe licensing is the right way to approach and resolve these things," he said.
Sure, you can use all the open source software you want ... as long as you pay Microsoft up-front first. Nice little open-source product you have there. Be a shame if anything were to happen to it.
But "he acknowledged the suit could hurt some of the efforts the company has tried to make in recent years to mend fences with the Linux world."
No shit? What was your first clue? The open-source world is not going to fully trust Microsoft as long as we can see that the other hand tucked casually behind Microsoft's back is still holding a baseball bat.