Q: How badly, exactly, does Windows Vista suck?

A:  This badly.

(As if you were in any remaining doubt.)

Why should wheels be round?

Discussions can lead to funny places.  For instance, as a result of an ad in Car & Driver, I was explaining to Goose the concept of "form follows function", and some of the features that a bicycle MUST have, as part of its form, in order to fulfil its function.  (For instance: there must be a place for the rider, a way to make it go, a way to make it stop, and a way to steer it.)  But beyond that, there's a lot of flexibility.

For instance, a bicycle doesn't have to have round wheels.

Yes, that is exactly what I meant.  If you build it correctly, you can build a bicycle whose wheels are not circular — not even elliptical — but which will nevertheless still work on an ordinary road.

Consider a bicycle whose wheels are constant-diameter polygons.  You can't just put them into a regular bicycle, because although their diameter is constant, their radius certainly isn't.  But suppose you attach each axle to a free-floating fork which is free to move vertically in the frame, and which does not actually support the frame.  Now, attach rollers to the frame which ride on top of the wheel, and which support the frame.

It'll look pretty strange, especially when in motion, as the axles and forks will be constantly working up and down as the bike moves.  But it'll work.  (In fact, it should give a smoother ride than a conventional bicycle with fixed forks, because in effect each tire is being used twice, giving close to twice as much shock/bump absorbtion for a given size tire.)

(I swear I did not front-load the music.  It's just what was up when I restarted my playlist.)