Profile

unixronin: Galen the technomage, from Babylon 5: Crusade (Default)
Unixronin

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Wednesday, April 13th, 2005 12:09 pm

A discussion of the fact that tax day does not, contrary to some recent quotes, fall upon the Ides of April (which is today, the 13th, not the 15th) led to a back-of-the envelope calculation that a 64-bit integer field would be sufficient to calculate and uniquely identify any point in time since the estimated time of the Big Bang to millisecond precision.  It was a simple step from there to calculate that approximately 84 bits wuold be required to do the same to cesium-beam atomic-clock resolution, and only slightly more complex to determine that with 140 bits to play with, one could enumerate time from the Big Bang to approximately six times the current estimated age of the Universe to quantum-time resolution (though, for obvious technical reasons, not with quantum-time precision).

Practical application of this calculation is left as an exercise for the reader.


Minor edit:  The first site I referred to had an error in their derivation of the Planck distance; they substituted Planck's constant for Dirac's, which is probably why they were two orders of magnitude off.  Enumeration of the life of the universe to date with quantum-time resolution should actually require around 144 bits.

Wednesday, April 13th, 2005 10:33 am (UTC)
I seem to recall numbers of about that precision are sufficient to locate any point in the universe as well to an absurd precision. (i.e. 128 x 128 x 128 or so..)

So ~500 bits is a pretty scary large number.

Guess we won't be getting to 128 bit addressing anytime soon on a computer. :-)
Wednesday, April 13th, 2005 11:25 am (UTC)
Actually, that's not necessarily true. There are already 128-bit processor architectures. Remember, just because you have the ability to address that much virtual memory doesn't mean that a corresponding amount of physical memory necessarily has to be present in the machine. And the fact that the virtual memory space is not fully populated doesn't necessarily limit your ability to use it; space-time, for instance, can probably be efficiently represented as an extremely sparse array. There are voids hundreds of millions of light-years across that are, to all practical scientific purposes, completely empty except for the occasional cosmic ray.
Thursday, April 14th, 2005 12:00 pm (UTC)
I doubt it's common knowledge that the idea fall on a different day depending on the month.